Amendment2BearArms

 Admendment 2: Right to Bear Arms  Group Members: German,Ashley,Kierra

Right to Bear Arms: This admendment allows the people in the U.S to have a gun of their own in their house, only for self defense uses, unconstitutional uses of this weapon will result in a serious punishement.

Analysis: People have the right to have a gun in their home? Are you confused about this?

You shouldn't be but if you are here is our way of what we think what the 2nd admendment means.

This means that they were allowed to keep a gun in their house for protection and self defense.they were not allowed to keep a hand gun on them unless they have a hand license from the state or country.  <span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="display: block; font-size: 130%; color: #050505; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff; text-align: left;"> Parker vs. District of Columbia: <span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="display: block; font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff; text-align: left;"> It all started when 6 people wanted to own six shotguns for their homes. The Gov't got into it saying that they couldn't own those weapons that they bought. They filed a complaint to the state,the state replied back and it ticked off the people. They took it to court and they judges took it down, it was the first time that a Federal appeals court had tooken down a gun law. In other words it broke rules and laws in the supreme court. The judges said that the 2nd admendment only resembles the militia. The District of Columbia filed a certpetition asking the Supreme court to accept the appeal, the supreme court accepted. On January 11,2008 a whole cluster of groups supporting the District of Columbia filed a brief in support of DC in **the case. On June     **     <span style="font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 50%; color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;">          <span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;">        ** 26, 2008 they affirmed the decison of the Court of Appeals ending the DC's 32 year old law. But the Supreme court stated that the other gun laws were consistent of the Constitiution,such as unconstitutional uses of the gun. Why is this important?

This is important because with out this right a lot of people could have die because there was nothing to save their lifes with. Even sometimes familes pass a away due to robbers and etc., but the lucky people who had a gun in their home, have saved not only their lifes but others**. Without this law what would happen to you? Would it affect you? Would you be reading this right now?, you be the judge.

Brady Center. "Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence." Gunlawsuits.org. 01 Oct. 2008. 2 Dec. 2008     <      <span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;">  http://www.gunlawsuits.org/docket/currentdocket.pdf#page=51             <span style="font-size: 130%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;">            >. <span style="display: block; font-size: 600%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff; text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 600%; font-family: 'Arial Black', Gadget, sans-serif;">           Roberts, John. "Opening statement." __Nettrekker__. 9 Dec. 2005. 5 Dec. 2008 < [|http://http://middle.nettrekker.com/isearch/frame/index.epl?image_id=282149000013] >. "United states district court for the district of Columbia." __Guncite__. 2003. 4 Dec. 2008 < http://guncite.com/court/fed/gun >.